Now in our 13th year of publication -- Thank you readers!

Send us an anonymous news tip,
your privacy will be assured! 

Click Here 

Send us your press release

E-mail: editor@calnews.com

Sacramento Update || Washington D.C. Update || Columnists & Editorials

And you thought the state was broke...$20 million in rebate funds remaining in the $31.7 million free money program
Cash for Appliances project gets big boost
By Mark Glover, Sacramento Bee
The California Energy Commission on Wednesday approved a major expansion of the state's Cash for Appliances program, adding energy-efficient dishwashers, freezers, water heaters, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. Starting today, rebates will include $50 for freezers, $100 for dishwashers, $300 to $750 for water heaters and $500 to $1,000 for HVAC systems. Since April 22, the CEC has been processing rebates of $200 for qualifying refrigerators, $100 for clothes washers and up to $50 for room air conditioners. Federal funding for the program was initiated to encourage consumers to purchase qualified high energy efficiency appliances and properly recycle old ones. California is looking for more people to take advantage of more than $20 million in rebate funds remaining in the $31.7 million program.

Visit CalNews.com's
Facebook Page

What has Dan Lungren done to earn your vote?

3rd Congressional District gas price watch:

When this man was elected to Congress, gas was $1.43 a gallon!



Recent price:

$3.17 gallon

Ask yourself why?



Your tax dollars at work...



Senator's looking out for your kids...

Prison Scandal...










Reader reaction...

"Mr. Kelso belongs in a mental institution himself. He is mentally ill if he thinks the Taxpayer needs to spend $96,000 annually on each of these slimeballs. Mr. Kelso is the epitomy of a power-drunk bureaucrat."


In the Governor's office:

Schwarzenegger orders a new round of unpaid furloughs
More than 150,000 California workers will be forced to take off three days a month — the equivalent of a 14% pay cut
By Shane Goldmacher, Los Angeles Times
More than 150,000 California state workers will again face unpaid furloughs, beginning in August, after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Wednesday declared a financial state of emergency and ordered them to take three days off per month. Starting the second Friday in August, much of California's government, including Department of Motor Vehicles offices, will be shuttered three times a month at least until a state budget is in place. The governor's critics called the order politically motivated, intended to ramp up pressure on the Legislature to pass a budget and on unions to make concessions on their pension plans. Schwarzenegger pitched the move as a necessity to avert a looming cash crunch.

Schwarzenegger vetoes overtime for farmworkers
Organic-farm owners contend that an eight-hour workday isn't practical in the agriculture industry
By Marc Lifsher, Los Angeles Times
Saying he didn't want to damage California's agricultural economy, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Wednesday vetoed a first-in-the-nation bill that would have given farmworkers the same rights to overtime pay enjoyed by all other hourly workers in California. Applying the eight-hour day to agriculture would be burdensome to business and reverse longstanding labor practices, Schwarzenegger wrote in a veto message. As recently as 1999, state lawmakers approved a bill that specifically exempted farmworkers from the eight-hour day, he said, "recognizing that agricultural work is different from other industries: it is seasonal, subject to unpredictability of Mother Nature and requires the harvesting of perishable goods." The veto message echoed arguments made by both giant agribusinesses and organic-farm owners. They contended that growers need special exemptions from labor laws because they operate on tight profit margins and need to work long hours to harvest crops quickly to get them to market.

Campaign and election news:

Poll: Governor, Senate races remain close
By the Associated Press, Sacramento Bee
Californians are split between the Democratic and Republican candidates in the contests for governor and U.S. Senate, with a large number of voters still undecided in both races, according to a poll released Wednesday. In the governor's race, Democrat Jerry Brown has support from 37 percent of likely voters, compared with 34 percent for Republican Meg Whitman, but nearly one in four voters were undecided in the Public Policy Institute of California's poll. The survey also shows 39 percent of likely voters support Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer while 34 percent support Republican challenger Carly Fiorina, with 22 percent undecided. Political newcomers Whitman and Fiorina have forced established Democrats into to tight races, even though Brown and Boxer are the nominees of a party with a large voter registration edge in California and enjoy high name recognition, said poll director Mark Baldassare. "It speaks about the political turbulence not just in California but in the nation," Baldassare said. "When you have so many people believing things are going in the wrong direction and feeling unsettled by the economy, it gives people pause for who they want to represent them and I think it's pretty uncertain at this point."

Whitman strategy in doubt after poll
By Steven Harmon, San Jose Mercury News
She has spent a fortune — $100 million and counting — and Republican Meg Whitman has not moved the dial against Jerry Brown in the gubernatorial race. Despite an aggressive summer campaign in which she went on the offensive against Brown immediately after winning the GOP primary, Whitman remains stuck behind Brown, 37 percent to 34 percent, according to a survey released Wednesday night by the Public Policy Institute of California. And her ramped-up attempt to appeal to Latino voters has not yet paid dividends: Brown's lead over Whitman among Latinos is more than double — 42 percent to 18. Brown also holds a slight lead among independents, 30 to 28 percent. The numbers show, political observers said, that Whitman's strategy of using the typically slow summer months to attack Brown and cut into a core Democratic constituency may not be working, raising questions over whether Whitman might have to re-evaluate her overall approach. In a state with a 13-point advantage for Democrats — 44.5 percent of registered voters are Democratic and 30.8 percent are Republican — Brown's built-in advantage is carrying him so far, said Bill Whalen, a fellow at the Hoover Institution and former aide to ex-Gov. Pete Wilson. "She's staying even in what is a very hostile environment for any politician," Whalen said. "The burden of proof is always for a Republican to prove they're mainstream."

Both sides of the immigration fence for Whitman
GOP gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman: "I don't think the Arizona law makes sense for California"
By Carla Marinucci, San Francisco Chronicle
California Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman, who has heavily advertised her opposition to Arizona's immigration law SB1070 on Spanish-language media, told conservative Talk Radio's "America's Morning News" Wednesday that "I would let the Arizona law stand for Arizona." The appearance was noted by the Huffington Post blogger Chris Kelly, who provided a link of the audio of her interview with the radio station on the East Coast: Whitman's comments came as a federal judge was poised to issue a ruling on the controversial Arizona law Wednesday; Judge Susan Bolton blocked key portions of the measure, setting off what's expected to be a prolonged legal battle over the matter. Whitman was asked about her views regarding the law, and she was also grilled about her thoughts on the impending ruling. Whitman's campaign in recent weeks has heavily advertised on Spanish language radio what it said has been her position on the issue: "NO a la Proposicion 187 y NO a la ley de Arizona." (NO to Prop. 187 and NO to the Arizona law.")

Jerry Brown offers ideas on education, environment
By David Siders, Sacramento Bee
Coming under attack for offering only a few specific policy proposals, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown released plans Wednesday to spend more money on higher education and to shift more K-12 decision-making authority to local schools. He also detailed positions on the environment, including opposition to new offshore oil drilling and support for measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The release of Brown's 12-point education plan and his environmental platform followed by less than a week his issuance of a plan for pension reform. Republican rival Meg Whitman is airing ads on TV and radio claiming Brown has no plan for governing California. In his education proposal, Brown said he would consolidate many of the state's "categorical" funding streams, which allocate money to schools that can be used only for certain purposes. He said he would allocate money to districts based on students' specific needs. Brown also proposed increasing funding for colleges and universities, reversing "the decades long trend of transferring state support from higher education to prisons."

California Republicans shunning one traditional path to victory: the environment
By Maeve Reston, Los Angeles Times
For decades, Republicans who won statewide office in California found success, at least in part, by showing sensitivity to voters' commitment to protecting the environment. But with state unemployment hovering at more than 12%, the two GOP candidates at the top of the ticket this year are betting that voters' concerns about jobs and economic uncertainty will trump any desire for environmental crusades. Republican Senate nominee Carly Fiorina has spent months charging Democratic incumbent Barbara Boxer with driving an extreme environmental agenda instead of tending to jobs. She has been sharply critical of national and state climate change legislation — deriding Boxer's concern as being about "the weather" — and has argued that the state should expand oil drilling off its shores. Gubernatorial nominee Meg Whitman has been more equivocal than Fiorina, but she also has cast the state's landmark climate change measure as one that kills jobs. She favors delaying its execution for a year to allow further study of its effect.

Proposition 23 backers sue over ballot language
The suit, filed against Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown, says the wording describing the measure is 'false, misleading and unfair'
By Margot Roosevelt, Los Angeles Times
Backers of Proposition 23, a November ballot initiative to suspend California's 2006 Global Warming Solutions Act, filed suit in Sacramento County Superior Court on Tuesday against Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown for what they called "false, misleading and unfair" language that would describe the measure on voters' ballots. The ballots, which must be printed by mid-August, would say that the measure "Suspends Air Pollution Control Laws Requiring Major Polluters to Report and Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions That Cause Global Warming Until Unemployment Drops Below Specified Level for Full Year." The Yes on Prop 23 campaign said in its court petition that the initiative's title and summary, drafted by Brown's office, should not refer to "air pollution control laws" because it does not apply to multiple laws, only the Global Warming Solutions Act, known as AB 32. Nor should it refer to "major polluters," the petition contended, because power plants and refineries are not the only institutions affected by the law, which covers emissions from universities, agricultural facilities, municipal buildings, and other private companies and citizens.

Maldonado to attend GOP fundraiser with Breitbart -- and is ready to give him the what-for
By Joe Garofoli, San Francisco Chronicle
For years -- even as we knocked down a beer with him at a recent GOP convention -- Lt. Gov. Abel Maldonado has talked about how he's a moderate Republican. You know, post-partisan and all that. And that's why Dems are going nuts with word that Abel will be sharing the bill at a GOP fundraiser next month with Andrew Breitbart -- aka the conservative media titan whose site presented the world with the creative editing of comments made by former Ag Dept. employee Shirley Sherrod. "So much for moderation," says CA Dem Party spokesman Tenoch Flores. "Imagined or otherwise." Team Maldo, what's up? "We were going to the function. We didn't even know this guy was invited," Team Maldo spokesperson Brandon Gesicki told us. The GOP event is a "stop-by" for Maldonado that night, he said. "But if we run into (Breitbart) we'll tell him what we think of what he did to that woman (Sherrod)," Gesicki said. Nope, Maldonado did not think it was cool.

Around the state:

California's city officials scramble to limit damage from Bell scandal
By Sam Allen, Abby Sewell and Patrick McGreevy, Los Angeles Times
The scandal over high salaries paid to Bell officials has city leaders throughout the state scrambling to limit the political damage. City halls have seen an uptick in residents calling to find out what their local officials make ever since the story broke two weeks ago and prompted widespread public outrage. On Thursday, city managers from across the state will gather in Sacramento to discuss damage control. Among the ideas on the table: launching an independent examination of city officials' salaries and compiling a database of salaries for municipal executives. The Legislature also is mulling several Bell-inspired proposals, including a requirement that cities make salaries easily accessible on websites.  Many of the ideas are designed to put political distance between Bell and the rest of California's 480 cities and towns. "It would be really unfortunate if anyone took the outrageous action of one city and generalized it to all cities," said Chris McKenzie, executive director of the League of California Cities, which is hosting the meeting. The stories of soaring salaries come at a difficult time for cities, which are making cutbacks amid a recession that has made many taxpayers ever more interested in what services they get for their tax dollars.
Pot a budget balancer?
By the Orange County Register
If voters in November pass Proposition 19 to legalize marijuana, Californians will be inhaling a new tax and regulatory environment as well. Voters are weighing it closely: A Reuters/Ipsos poll taken in late June found that Prop. 19 was opposed by Californians, 50 percent to 48 percent. A key element of the "Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010" is taxation, coming at a time when the state has difficulty balancing its budget every year. The deficit for the still-unpassed budget for fiscal year 2010-11, which began July 1, is pegged at $19 billion. California NORML, a pro-legalization group, estimates that legalization could bring in from $1.2 billion to $1.4 billion a year in tax revenue and reduced enforcement costs:  But a recent study by the RAND Drug Policy Research Center called such numbers into doubt. It found: "The pretax retail price of marijuana will substantially decline, likely by more than 80 percent. The price consumers pay will depend heavily on taxes, the regulatory regime structure, and how taxes and regulations are enforced." It also said tax revenue could be "dramatically lower or higher than the $1.4 billion estimate."

Yet more furloughs? Why not a budget?
By the Sacramento Bee
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's bullying tactics are tiresome, mean-spirited and destructive. California needs a budget. Negotiations are drifting, a month past the July 1 start of the fiscal year. Although a limited number of furloughs served their purpose early in this crisis – to avoid layoffs – they have outlived their welcome. Workers least able to afford the pay cuts will be most damaged by continued furloughs. Small businesses will be hurt as workers reduce spending to make up for pay cuts. Difficult though it may be, Schwarzenegger needs to knock off the cheap tricks and truly engage in budget negotiations.

California Senate leader offers pathway out of budget stalemate
By George Skelton, Los Angeles Times
An eternal optimist, state Senate leader Darrell Steinberg believes he has found a solution to this summer's annual budget standoff. It's conceivable. He calls it "a pathway." Any pathway to a balanced budget, however, still seems like a long trek. We're now four weeks into a new fiscal year without a state spending plan. "We need a greater sense of urgency," says Steinberg, a Sacramento Democrat. No kidding. Also some courage by Democrats to cut more spending. Here's his thinking: Increase state income taxes for everyone and also raise the vehicle license fee (or car tax).

Oceans protector gets tossed off ship
By Dan Morain, Sacramento Bee
Don Benninghoven is an unlikely martyr to the cause of ocean protection. He built a solid reputation for honesty as director of the League of California Cities for three decades, retired a decade ago to Santa Barbara, and was working on his tennis game when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger enlisted this fellow Republican to become immersed in ocean issues. Now 76, Benninghoven is a convert to the concept of marine reserves – coastal waters where fishing is banned so depleted stocks can regenerate, as required by the Marine Life Protection Act of 1999. "The act is horribly important. I want it to be successful," Benninghoven said. He won't be around to carry it out. Senate Democrats who lay claim to be environmentalists should have embraced him. But this is election season in a term-limited era. Legislators who championed ocean protection in the 1990s are long gone. Facing a well-orchestrated lobbying effort by an organization out of Virginia, the Senate refuses to confirm Benninghoven to the five-member California Fish and Game Commission, where he almost surely would have cast a deciding vote in favor of greater marine protection. Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg ordinarily would push to confirm someone like Benninghoven. There is no hint of scandal, and environmentalists support him.

 
Sacramento Update || Washington D.C. Update || Columnists & Editorials

CalNews.com Special Project

CalNews.com  Special Project

CalNews.com  Special Project

***